It’s a gimmick book. If
that sort of thing annoys you, then don’t read it. While I would fall on the side of generally
avoiding such things, assuming that it is there to hide what’s lacking, that’s
not always so. House of Leaves would be a prime example of a gimmick book, but it
was definitely worth reading, even all those pages with one word on them. What is going on here is a book of twelve
chapters, each half as long as the previous and built around the phases of the
moon. There’s also the characters,
twelve of them, representing the various astrological signs. None of this really intruded on the story to
me, and the ever shortening chapters helped give the book momentum as it moves
to its end. It _does_ make the first
chapter a long one – this is a hefty book (800 and some pages), and chapter 1
is half of it, but get through that (and it’s not hard) and it’s all downhill.
The story. New
Zealand. 1866. Frontier gold mining town. 12 men of the town of Hokitika have gathered
together to discuss the strange events – a missing young man who has made his
fortune, a prostitute who has attempted suicide, a recluse found dead in his
remote cabin, and of course, a fortune in gold. Each of the men has his own
special relationships to the events and the people involved (particularly Anna,
the prostitute). The newest man in town,
Walter Moody, trained as a lawyer but trying his hand at prospecting for gold,
stumbles upon the meeting and realizes he has his own part of the story to
tell.
This is a big, complex story, involving old grudges and
betrayals, greed, lust, and some nicer aspects of humanity as well. Much like Dickens, there is a young, innocent
hero who is more swept up in the book’s events than driving them, an intrepid
detective who may or may not be a step or two behind, mixed in with shipping,
prospecting, banking and local political life.
This can be an odd read at times – I thought that Walter would be the
main focus of the story, yet he essentially disappears for a long stretch in
the middle of the book (he does eventually find his place), and there are some
odd plot points that seemed neglected, but were eventually picked up. It even makes sense why later on, if again,
you are willing to go along with some of the more metaphysical aspects of the
plot.
Catton is a seriously good writer; she adopts the style of
the time and it was pretty seamless to me.
Having read The Crimson Petal and
the White at about the same time, comparing the two is a lot of fun –
Catton stays squarely in the time in an absolute mode, while Michael Faber
slaps modern sexual mores into his novel.